City Travel Guides
Home Page > Go back a page
Books : American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer
Search Books - select a category
Rating: 
- weighty but rewarding
This is a hefty tome that grips in a way that few biographies do. A book of 3 acts, the first covers Oppenheimers early years and rise through academia as well as events on a personal level that shape his later life. The second act deals with Manhattan, Trinity and Hiroshima but it is arguably the 3rd act concentrating on Oppenheimers fall from political grace that is the most satisfying.
The true genius of this book is that it succeeds in placing the man in the broader political picture of the time and revealing a character that was as much ahead of his own time as he was misunderstood and perhaps naive.
Rating: - huge biography
This is one of the best biographys i have ever read. you are guided into the mind of a complex conflicted individual. the accunt of oppenheimer's security hearing is masterful. i strongly recommend it.
Rating: - "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."
To help their readers understand the life and career of Robert Oppenheimer, Bird and Sherwin provide about as much information as most people can absorb and digest. Of greatest interest to me is what they have to say in response to questions such as these:
1. What were the dominant influences and defining moments during Oppenheimer's youth and adolescence? What later proved to be the significance of each?
2. Why do Bird and Sherwin characterize him as the "American Prometheus"?
3. What do they consider to be the nature and extent of his triumph and tragedy"? What specific evidence do they offer in support of their assertions?
4. Of all of Oppenheimer's personal as well as professional relationships, which did he consider to be most important? Why?
5. Which did he consider to be most difficult and disruptive? Why?
6. With regard to the Manhattan Project, what were the greatest challenges which Oppenheimer faced when he began his involvement with it?
7. Over time, how did he respond to each? With what result(s)?
8. During preparations to produce the bombs eventually dropped on Hiroshima and then Nagasaki in August of 1945, to what extent (if any) did Oppenheimer's own thoughts and feelings about the use of nuclear weapons? Why?
9. Do Bird and Sherwin agree with Ward Evans (the dissenting member of the Atomic Energy Commission's hearing board, that denying Oppenheimer his security clearance was "a black mark on the escutcheon of our country"? If so, why? If not, why not?
10. Finally, what enduring lessons can be learned from Oppenheimer's personal life and professional career?
To their great credit, Bird and Sherwin anchor their responses to these and other questions within a frame-of-reference for each response based on rigorous and extensive research. It is noteworthy that their "Notes" are provided on pages 601-684 and their "Bibliography" requires an additional fifteen pages.
Here are a few brief excerpts of special significance. First, Oppenheimer's recollection (in 1965) of reactions to the explosion of "The Gadget" (on July 16, 1945) which sent a mushroom cloud soaring into the heavens above Point Zero: "We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty, and impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, `Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another."
After the AEC's security hearing and subsequent denial of Oppenheimer security clearance, the impact on the scientific community: "For a few years after World War II, scientists had been regarded as a new class of intellectuals, members of a public-policy priesthood who might legitimately offer expertise not only as scientists but as public philosophers. With Oppenheimer's defrocking, scientists knew that in the future they could serve the state only as experts on narrow scientific issues. As the sociologist Daniel Bell later observed, Oppenheimer's ordeal signified that the postwar `messianic style of the scientists' was now at an end....The trial thus represented a watershed in the relations of the scientist to the government. The narrowest vision of how American should serve their country had triumphed."
Finally, the impact on Oppenheimer himself: "Far from being indifferent, Robert was acutely aware of the sufferings he had caused others in his life -- and yet he would not allow himself to succumb to guilt. He would accept responsibility; he had never tried to deny his responsibility. But since the security hearing, he nevertheless no longer seemed to have the capacity or motivation to fight against the `cruelty' of indifference. In that sense, [Isidor] Rabi had been right: `They achieved their goal. They killed him.'"
Bird and Sherwin have written an eloquent as well as rigorous and comprehensive analysis of J. Robert Oppenheimer, "American Prometheus." While doing so, they have also revealed a great deal about the age in which he lived. And also while doing so, yes, they have re-examined many of the same themes which Aeschylus did....2,500 years ago.
Rating: - A Fairly Well Balanced and Researched Book: Impressive
This is a well crafted and detailed story of J. Robert Oppenheimer, and in general it is an impressive effort by the authors - being almost 750 pages long. I guess in an era of sales hype I did find the book jacket inside notes a bit annoying in that the people marketing the book claim that this is the first comprehensive biography on Oppenheimer. Technically speaking one can debate that fine point, and perhaps it is true in narrow terms, but a quick GOOGLE search will show that there are many books and articles on Oppenheimer going back at least 40 years. Plus there have been books and articles on the Oppenheimer-Lawrence relationship. I had already read at least two books including the 1968 book Lawrence and Oppenheimer by Nuel Pharr Davis, and I read it decades ago, plus there are many others, so long ago that I now forget which book I read and which I did not, but I did read the Davis book and it had a lot of similar information.
Now for the present book, it is definitely a well researched and it is a comprehensive book that covers the mostly complete story from his birth to the end and his throat cancer. There are many excellent photographs, lots of notes, and much documentation. It is well written and well crafted as a book and presents the human side of the man along with all the political pressures.
In an era of The Patriot Act, I thought that the book had a number of very important points and lessons for humanity, and also the price of dissent in our free society. Here we follow the story of Oppenheimer and how his worked and sweated under a lot of pressure to make the first few weapons, but having made them he realized the implications and their danger. He was strongly against the next step - that of making the hydrogen bomb and thought the plutonium nukes were themselves dangerous enough. As we already knew in general, but perhaps not in the detail presented here in this new book, that his opposition to mega-bomb cost him his security clearance and tarnished his reputation. Oppenheimer - according to the present book - thought the hydrogen bomb would never be used since it would cause too much devastation and was a waste of money. But it was too big a concept for the military to ignore and it went forward. In retrospect he has been correct, in fact since Japan in 1945, almost 60 years ago, no nuclear weapon of any type has been used.
Some of the facts reviewed in the book seem to back up Oppenheimer's concern that things might get out of control. We learn that the US produced 70,000 nuclear weapons, almost one bomb for every 2000 people in the USSR, and the total cost was 5.5 trillion dollars. It is no wonder the USSR went broke as they tried to keep up. Also, that sum is about equal, but slightly less than the total US government debt today, a staggering number. Now, as Oppenheimer had feared the technology is spreading.
This is an excellent book on Oppenheimer, but ignore the hype, it is not the only book.
5 stars - great read.
- weighty but rewardingThis is a hefty tome that grips in a way that few biographies do. A book of 3 acts, the first covers Oppenheimers early years and rise through academia as well as events on a personal level that shape his later life. The second act deals with Manhattan, Trinity and Hiroshima but it is arguably the 3rd act concentrating on Oppenheimers fall from political grace that is the most satisfying.
The true genius of this book is that it succeeds in placing the man in the broader political picture of the time and revealing a character that was as much ahead of his own time as he was misunderstood and perhaps naive.
Rating:
- huge biographyThis is one of the best biographys i have ever read. you are guided into the mind of a complex conflicted individual. the accunt of oppenheimer's security hearing is masterful. i strongly recommend it.
Rating:
- "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."To help their readers understand the life and career of Robert Oppenheimer, Bird and Sherwin provide about as much information as most people can absorb and digest. Of greatest interest to me is what they have to say in response to questions such as these:
1. What were the dominant influences and defining moments during Oppenheimer's youth and adolescence? What later proved to be the significance of each?
2. Why do Bird and Sherwin characterize him as the "American Prometheus"?
3. What do they consider to be the nature and extent of his triumph and tragedy"? What specific evidence do they offer in support of their assertions?
4. Of all of Oppenheimer's personal as well as professional relationships, which did he consider to be most important? Why?
5. Which did he consider to be most difficult and disruptive? Why?
6. With regard to the Manhattan Project, what were the greatest challenges which Oppenheimer faced when he began his involvement with it?
7. Over time, how did he respond to each? With what result(s)?
8. During preparations to produce the bombs eventually dropped on Hiroshima and then Nagasaki in August of 1945, to what extent (if any) did Oppenheimer's own thoughts and feelings about the use of nuclear weapons? Why?
9. Do Bird and Sherwin agree with Ward Evans (the dissenting member of the Atomic Energy Commission's hearing board, that denying Oppenheimer his security clearance was "a black mark on the escutcheon of our country"? If so, why? If not, why not?
10. Finally, what enduring lessons can be learned from Oppenheimer's personal life and professional career?
To their great credit, Bird and Sherwin anchor their responses to these and other questions within a frame-of-reference for each response based on rigorous and extensive research. It is noteworthy that their "Notes" are provided on pages 601-684 and their "Bibliography" requires an additional fifteen pages.
Here are a few brief excerpts of special significance. First, Oppenheimer's recollection (in 1965) of reactions to the explosion of "The Gadget" (on July 16, 1945) which sent a mushroom cloud soaring into the heavens above Point Zero: "We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty, and impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, `Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another."
After the AEC's security hearing and subsequent denial of Oppenheimer security clearance, the impact on the scientific community: "For a few years after World War II, scientists had been regarded as a new class of intellectuals, members of a public-policy priesthood who might legitimately offer expertise not only as scientists but as public philosophers. With Oppenheimer's defrocking, scientists knew that in the future they could serve the state only as experts on narrow scientific issues. As the sociologist Daniel Bell later observed, Oppenheimer's ordeal signified that the postwar `messianic style of the scientists' was now at an end....The trial thus represented a watershed in the relations of the scientist to the government. The narrowest vision of how American should serve their country had triumphed."
Finally, the impact on Oppenheimer himself: "Far from being indifferent, Robert was acutely aware of the sufferings he had caused others in his life -- and yet he would not allow himself to succumb to guilt. He would accept responsibility; he had never tried to deny his responsibility. But since the security hearing, he nevertheless no longer seemed to have the capacity or motivation to fight against the `cruelty' of indifference. In that sense, [Isidor] Rabi had been right: `They achieved their goal. They killed him.'"
Bird and Sherwin have written an eloquent as well as rigorous and comprehensive analysis of J. Robert Oppenheimer, "American Prometheus." While doing so, they have also revealed a great deal about the age in which he lived. And also while doing so, yes, they have re-examined many of the same themes which Aeschylus did....2,500 years ago.
Rating:
- A Fairly Well Balanced and Researched Book: ImpressiveThis is a well crafted and detailed story of J. Robert Oppenheimer, and in general it is an impressive effort by the authors - being almost 750 pages long. I guess in an era of sales hype I did find the book jacket inside notes a bit annoying in that the people marketing the book claim that this is the first comprehensive biography on Oppenheimer. Technically speaking one can debate that fine point, and perhaps it is true in narrow terms, but a quick GOOGLE search will show that there are many books and articles on Oppenheimer going back at least 40 years. Plus there have been books and articles on the Oppenheimer-Lawrence relationship. I had already read at least two books including the 1968 book Lawrence and Oppenheimer by Nuel Pharr Davis, and I read it decades ago, plus there are many others, so long ago that I now forget which book I read and which I did not, but I did read the Davis book and it had a lot of similar information.
Now for the present book, it is definitely a well researched and it is a comprehensive book that covers the mostly complete story from his birth to the end and his throat cancer. There are many excellent photographs, lots of notes, and much documentation. It is well written and well crafted as a book and presents the human side of the man along with all the political pressures.
In an era of The Patriot Act, I thought that the book had a number of very important points and lessons for humanity, and also the price of dissent in our free society. Here we follow the story of Oppenheimer and how his worked and sweated under a lot of pressure to make the first few weapons, but having made them he realized the implications and their danger. He was strongly against the next step - that of making the hydrogen bomb and thought the plutonium nukes were themselves dangerous enough. As we already knew in general, but perhaps not in the detail presented here in this new book, that his opposition to mega-bomb cost him his security clearance and tarnished his reputation. Oppenheimer - according to the present book - thought the hydrogen bomb would never be used since it would cause too much devastation and was a waste of money. But it was too big a concept for the military to ignore and it went forward. In retrospect he has been correct, in fact since Japan in 1945, almost 60 years ago, no nuclear weapon of any type has been used.
Some of the facts reviewed in the book seem to back up Oppenheimer's concern that things might get out of control. We learn that the US produced 70,000 nuclear weapons, almost one bomb for every 2000 people in the USSR, and the total cost was 5.5 trillion dollars. It is no wonder the USSR went broke as they tried to keep up. Also, that sum is about equal, but slightly less than the total US government debt today, a staggering number. Now, as Oppenheimer had feared the technology is spreading.
This is an excellent book on Oppenheimer, but ignore the hype, it is not the only book.
5 stars - great read.